The line graph depicts the four heterogenous materials which were recycled during the years between 1982 and 2010 In a specific nation. This data is collaborated in percentage.
To inititate, in 1982, three major products as paper, cupboard and glass container are highly reprocessed in a factory at 66%. Meanwhile other chemical manufactured products aluminium and canes dropped significantly and reached to minimal at 1% only in 1990 respectively. Furthermore, around 80% paper cups recapitulated in 1994. Manufacture commenced reprocessing of aluminium at 40% by the passage of time.
Secondly, plastic made products were remaind constant. And no diversion was seen from 1994 to 2010. What is more...! Paper and cupboard illustrated down ward trend at 70% end of year. In contrast, glass contains was maximum recycled just 60%
Overall, it is lucid that plastic products was not maximum recycled. It is made by dangrous chemical which is known bpm.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 72
- q...The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process shown.•You shou 56
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 93
- Nowadays, people get information through news and papers, but meanwhile are uncertain about the truth of these news. Should we believe the journalists? What qualities should a good journalist or a correspondent have? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...highly reprocessed in a factory at 66%. Meanwhile other chemical manufactured products al...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, secondly, while, in contrast, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40666666667 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00332408434 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.706666666667 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2391344693 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7272727273 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6363636364 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103711726913 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364043770098 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637001021388 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699321836751 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758980467407 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.