The line graph compares the consist of the population aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and the USA over a period of 100 years.
It is clear that the proportion of people who are 65 years old and over sees a dramatically rise in three different countries over the period shown. The ratio of total increasement provides the highest amount in Japan.
In 1940, the ratio of Americans 65 years and older were the most, reaching about 9 percent, while there were 7 percent in Sweden and only 5 percent in Japan. About 60 years later, proportion of the population aged 65 and over rose about 15 percent in Sweden and America. By contrast, the consist of the population aged 65 and over had a small decrease. The 65-year and older Japanese ratio will get to around 27 percent in Japan in 2040, which is the highest amount, and the lowest one is about 23 percent in the USA.
The proportion of population aged 65 and over rose from 1940 to 1982 and remained almost stable for 36 years later and will keep rise until 2040 in the USA. The ratio of people aged 65 and over in Sweden increased likely the USA from 1940 to 1995, and finally will rise to 25 percent. The 65-year and older people in Japan is below 10 percent until 2030 and will rise dramatically over the following ten years.
- Line Graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows Internet Users as percentage of population in USA Mexico and Canada from 1999 to 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The line graph compares the consist of the population aged 65 and over in J...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... is clear that the proportion of people who are 65 years old and over sees a dramatical...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...ople who are 65 years old and over sees a dramatically rise in three different countries over the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ent in Sweden and America. By contrast, the consist of the population aged 65 and over had ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d will keep rise until 2040 in the USA. The ratio of people aged 65 and over in Swe...
^^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...5, and finally will rise to 25 percent. The 65-year and older people in Japan is be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41772151899 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29479237244 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447257383966 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4276190327 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224921660555 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115091247194 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664262172318 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163458513655 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019719242721 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.