The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 9n the three countries
The line graph illustrates the percentage of the senior population in the category of three countries over the course of a century from 1940 to 2040.
Overall, the ratio of elderly people in the USA and Sweden has remained higher than that in Japan in 1940 and would be still 2030. However, there is the prediction that the ratio of elderly people in Japan population will have a sharp rise over that in USA and Sweden afterward.
At the start of the period, the ratio of citizens who aged 65 or above was around 5 to 10 % in three countries. It steadily increased in USA and Sweden over 40 years in 1989, while the aging population in Japan slightly slumped in the ranked nation. The USA was the country which has the highest ratio of aged people in the population.
In the later period, the proportion of aged people in the population of Sweden jumped over the ratio of USA. Addition, The number of elderly people in Japan’s population has started going up since 1989.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 9n the three countries 67
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61142857143 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47241365616 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508571428571 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0507227773 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261388753506 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125059309931 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877929315809 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18066799051 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915104646851 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.