The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line graph compares among Sweden, USA along with Japan in terms of the percentage of the elderly older than 65 year-old over the period of a century.
It is clear that Japanese senior citizens had accounted for by far the lowest proportion of population aged over 65 years since 1940, but Japan will see the highest proportion in the last decade of the period. In contrast, the US is expected to have fewer aged citizens than Sweden and Japan in 2040, despite its larger percentage in the beginning.
In 1940, the average old population in Japan was the lowest in comparison with the other two countries, with only 5%. The equivalent figure for the US was almost double that of Japan, at roughly 10%. Since then, the percentage of the aged American residents had gradually increased, peaking at close to 25% in 2040. By contrast, the proportion of elder Japanese population still remained relatively low at between 3% to 5% during the first six decades of the period.
With respect to Sweden, its ageing citizens saw a stable rise from 1940 to now, heading towards to 25 % in 2040. Interestingly the proportion of old population in Japan was predicted to overtake the other two counterparts thanks to a considerable growth of over 15% in the later 30s.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives. But few people achieve it. What are the causes of the problems? How to overcome it? 89
- The increase in food production owes much to fertilizers and better machinery, but some people think that it has a negative impact on human health and community. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, still, then, in contrast, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8119266055 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65312914576 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4776925217 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261523315335 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102016858614 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550249744159 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158678595218 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408840497356 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.