The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The diagram below illustrates the percentage of senior citizens in the period of a century from 1940 to 2040 in three countries Japan, Sweden and USA.
Overall, the figures were recorded with an upward trend for the number of people who are 65-year-olds and over in the period given.
The percentage of elders in Japan, Sweden and USA started at around 5%, 7% and 9% in 1940. Before being expected to witness a modest growth about that of those and shoot up to a peak of 20%, 17% in Sweden and the USA in 2040, the figure gradually increased from 7% to roughly 20%, and from 9% to 15% from 1940 to 2018. In contrast, the amount of senior Japanese slightly climb to 7% in 2018.
The figure in Japan, however, was projected to be about to witness an explosion, starting at more than 7% in 2018, experiencing then a threefold jump before surpassing both Sweden and USA to soar to a peak of roughly 28% during the next 20 years from 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-29 | arianamirkiai | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | arianamirkiai | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | arianamirkiai | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | arianamirkiai | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | arianamirkiai | 78 | view |
- Radio and Television audiences in UK, October - December 1992 73
- Compare the percentages of travelers to go to work in a country in Europe 11
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have developed imagination and gain better language skills than people watching TV. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...n upward trend for the number of people who are 65-year-olds and over in the period giv...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46820809249 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41509226612 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2028438552 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0684494810333 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397296568066 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387596783421 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521234139462 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412271179146 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.