The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975, 1995 and 2015
The bar graph depicts the distribution of magazine preferences among customers over a span of 20 years.
In general, it is evident that sports magazines consistently held the highest share throughout the three periods, while magazines centered around food garnered the least interest.
The sales of sports magazines exhibited a steady increase over the given years. Commencing at 32% in 1975, the proportion of sports magazines climbed to 36% in 1995, and further rose to 42% in 2015.
Conversely, the trends for food and other types of magazines were characterized by fluctuations over the surveyed years. In 1975, food magazines constituted 10% of the total, whereas other genres made up 26%. These figures surged to 22% and 33% respectively by 1995, before regressing to their initial percentages.
The distribution of fashion and local interest chocolate magazines amounted to 22% and 27% respectively in 1975. However, there was a minor decline by 1995. By 2015, the proportion of local interest chocolate magazines remained constant at 20%, while the percentage for fashion magazines sharply plummeted to 5%
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that government should have the responsibility To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie chart illustrates the proportion of volunteers by organizations from 2008 to 2014
- More and more people want to buy clothes car and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38857142857 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95434650393 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9416193291 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274136726559 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105016953119 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588026231118 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141817141249 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054789162888 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.