The graph below shows the proportions of workers in three different sectors in South Korea between 1981 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant . Write at least 150 words .
The given line graph illustrates a number of employees in services , agriculture and industry in South Korea throughout the period from 1981 to 2011.
Overall , it can be obviously seen that there were significant changes in the employment rate of services and agriculture while that of industry remained relatively stable. Besides , figures for services were always the highest one during the period given.
Looking at the figure in further details, it is evident that an upward trend was seen the proportion of workers in services whereas that of agriculture fell dramatically from 34% to roughly 20%. At the same time , the quantity of employees working in industry increase by 7% to 35%.
Turning to the remaining statistics , it can be observed that after 10-year period , the majority consistently chose to work in services , at exactly 60 % , followed by agriculture and industry, at approximately 18% and 30% respectively. Subsequently , figures for services went up continuously before peaking at nearly 70 % . Meanwhile, percentage of industry and agriculture employment still decreased until reached its low, at 25% and about 6% respectively.
- The graph below shows the proportions of workers in three different sectors in South Korea between 1981 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...untry passed the driving exam, compared to much lower men, at roughly 30%. Subsequ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68205128205 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35816039469 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558974358974 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.693834632 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0206481951435 0.215688989381 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0120357140918 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0120806892503 0.0843802449381 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0151595696229 0.15604864568 10% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100638655315 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.