The diagram compares the different quantities of goods in UK that were transported in four distinct means of transportation from 1974 to 2002, in 4-yearly intervals.
Overall, all modes experienced rises over the period except for railways which fluctuated in the middle. Besides, roadways were the most popular among four type of means, while pipeline contributed the least figure.
In 1974, water and rail shared almost equal proportion at around 40 million tones of goods, and both of them remained relatively unchanged until 1978. However, the number of goods delivered by water increased considerably in 1982 and hit over 60 million in the last year. In contrast, the latter showed a fluctuation between 1982 and 1994 before reaching a little more than 40 million.
Road transport stood at 70 million tones initially, rising steadily until 1990 when it reached over 80 million. After a slight fall in the next four years, it continued to rise gradually for the following years to reach a high of just below 100 million.
There was a gradual growth in quantity of goods transported by pipeline, from around 5 million from 1974 to a little over 20 million in 2002.
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 67
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 75
- The chart gives information about UK immigration emigration and net migration between 1999 and 2008 78
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02051282051 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66392363852 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65641025641 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1880052396 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194409746304 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082490216324 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961020346462 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128296203806 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109543406599 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.