The bar chart compares the changes in the amount of carbon dioxide emission from four different vehicles and the line graph illustrates the number of vehicles from 2000 to 2020 in England and Wales.
Overall, three types of vehicles witnessed a remarkable growth, while the figures for bus remained relatively unchanged throughout the years. There was a gradual increase in number of vehicles from 2000 to 2015 and it is expected to keep rising until 2020.
Cars contributed the most significant emissions over the period shown and it stood at 20 tons in 2000, while the figure for buses was just below a half as high as that of car, around 8 tons. Around 13 and 15 tons of emissions were reported for trucks and vans respectively.
By 2020, the figure for cars is expected to increase over 25 tons, while buses will continue to be the lowest share among four, at 8 tons. Both trucks and vans are forecast to produce more emissions at around 23 and 15 tons respectively. 2000 saw just around 20 million number of vehicles. However, it rose significantly over the timescale and is expected to peak at approximately 55 million by 2020.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 44
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 75
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000, while the figure for buses was just below a half as high as that of car in t...
^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'share'.
Suggestion: share
...same year, around 8 tons. The emissions shares of trucks and vans were around 15 and 1...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70443349754 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58630541684 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.438849527 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20296966259 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875800054676 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724011111927 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122239079128 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763717050435 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.