The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph displays the numbers of goods shifted in the UK during the period of 28-year from 1974 to 2002 by four means of transport.
Overall, what standing out from the graph is that road transport was the most popular mode to be used throughout the period. Meanwhile, transportation using pipeline was the least usage among four studied methods. Besides, merchandises delivered by water vehicles and railway were relatively in high demand.
With regards to road transport, its figure was the highest from the beginning with solid 70 million tons then saw an inconsistent upward and downward trend until 1995, the quantities of goods transported soared to 98 million tons. Afterwards, the direction gradually slowed down and only reached 1 more million ton in the end of the period. As mentioned above, although pipeline transport was not a popular mode, the data witnessed a slightly stable rise which started by roughly from 4 to 21 million tons during 21 years between 1974 and 1995. Since then, the number had not experienced any changes.
Turning to the remaining modes, they started the period with almost same quantities and after four years, the numbers were absolutely equal at 40 million tons. However, while water transport slumped in 1981 to 58 million tons after a rise slope and dropped to 51 million tons in 1998 but later had a significant recovery in the last year with 68. In contrast, transportation by train fell heavily in 1995 to only 27 million tons of goods and finally jumped to the starting point as 41 million tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | Ly8 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | Anastasia0511 | 82 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 73
- The diagrams show the life circle of a species of large fish called salmon 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...lly slowed down and only reached 1 more million ton in the end of the period. As mentio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93486590038 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60312615184 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5217406766 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.090909091 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183102073588 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752316252567 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695835465648 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140202867517 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651931161301 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.