The line graph depicts the amounts of goods transported using four distinct types of transport in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
As regards the first, it is way using road. It was about 70 million tonnes in 1974 rose to its highest point at just under 100 million tonnes in 2002. This similar increasing trend can be seen on goods transported by water and pipeline, they started below than 40 and 20 tonnes and about 5 million tonnes respectively and rose to just above 60 and above 20 million tonnes in 2002.
An opposite trend can be observed for the goods transported using rail. In 1974, it was exactly 40 million tonnes and declined to about 30 million tonnes in 1984. It then showed a fluctuation pattern from 1984 to 1995. It rose considerably until the last year.
Overall, it is clearly shown that the amounts of goods transported in the UK by all four different types of transport increased over the given period but although the level of goods transported using rail increased, initial values did not change with final.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 78
- To some people, studying the past has little value in the modern world. Why do you think it’s important to do so? What will be the effect if children are not taught history? 56
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 84
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65934065934 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45687352315 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5963624043 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224558993604 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921808665991 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102026132908 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175254075408 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996861421315 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.