The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The line graph illustrates the four methods of transportation of goods in UK from year 1974 to 2002. The amounts are measured in million tonnes and the four different modes are road, water, rail and pipeline. Overall, it can be seen that the highest quantities of goods were transported by road throughout this time period.

While road delivery marks highest quantity, water and pipeline shows almost same pattern within the same duration. In 1974, road transportation has started at seventy million tonnes and water and rail modes were at fourty million tonnes. But, at that time pipeline mode stayed at five million tonnes marking the lower level.

Until the year 1978, there were slight change in all four method. After this year the amount of goods which transported by rail has begun to drop while other three modes started to rise in significant amount. This trend was continued until 1995 for the road and pipeline method. After this year these two methods are used rigorously for the delivery of goods. However, water method achieved this sharp increase in 1998 and continued to rise.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...74 to 2002. The amounts are measured in million tonnes and the four different modes are...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'marks the highest'.
Suggestion: marks the highest
...his time period. While road delivery marks highest quantity, water and pipeline shows almo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... were slight change in all four method. After this year the amount of goods which tra...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00546448087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37096766167 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9537803653 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.2727272727 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09090909091 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248239371133 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976725853247 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116176562981 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19464536453 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153468807617 0.0819641961636 187% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.