Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Countries should focus their attention to develop the railway system but not the roads. This essay will advocate above statement because travelling by train is inexpensive and traffic on the roads could be reduced by maintaining a highly developed railway system.
Using railways is rather inexpensive compared to the other mode of transportation. This means that the same distance which is travelling by train will cost lower than using the bus or someone's own vehicle such as cars. Passengers attraction for train has increased because the money plays a pivotal role in day-to-day life of the era of consumer society. In Sri Lanka, for instance, there would be a ten fold increase in expenditure by car to train travel. Therefore the government has to improve their locomotive in order to reduce the amount of money which is spent by people of the country.
The congestion on roads can be reduced by increased use of train as a method of commute. To elaborate, traffic jam is a huge reason which make the roads less attractive for users. Less traffic on the roads would ultimately benefit the government by allowing them to spend tax payers' precious money on other social infrastructure as well as save the valuable time of road users. A recent study has showed that average Sri Lankan spend four hours per week on roads in Colombo, the capital city, because of the traffic and the condition will be expected to continue to worse in next five years by twenty percent.
In conclusion, regulatory bodies are bound to upgrade their railway system and spend less on roads. Low cost and the reduced traffic congestion are the major reason for this choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Nayan Soni | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Motu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Saahaar | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Mampee | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... in expenditure by car to train travel. Therefore the government has to improve their loc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that average Sri Lankan spend four hours per week on roads in Colombo, the capita...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91459074733 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62440496585 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.835226716 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.230769231 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157057716028 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583454042271 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453875746635 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104159274726 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340701798564 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.