The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given illustrates the information about how many quantities were carried by four categories, namely road, water, rail, a pipeline in the UK over the course of 28 years, from 1974 to 2002.
As it can be seen from the line graph the percentage of using rail to transmit good saw a fluctuation while the figure for others in the UK is an upward trend over the period.
In 1974, there was about 70 million of using transportation by road, while just under 5 million of that by pipeline. There was the same in taking produces by water and rail, at 40 million.
Over 28 years, the produces were carried by road in the UK grew considerably before it reached a peak in 2002, about 100 million. The figure of water saw a slight oscillation before going up in 2002, around 70 million. This was the same pattern as the pipeline. This rose dramatically, at approximately 20 million. By contrast, there was a sharp decline in using rail, around 30 million before rising slightly, about 40 million in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | PsycRicky | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Raksadil | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | bibikulsum | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 89
- The following two pie charts show the results of the survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among adults in 1985 and 1995 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59668508287 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63502899354 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.767443636 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107143055592 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430101986052 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503988383503 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783381204262 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472519051352 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.