The pie graph below shows the results of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate.
The two charts illustrate how many pupils participate in cultural and leisure activities. The graphs compare the preference habits of both boys and girls.
Overall, the data indicate that the proportion of computer games in boys is higher than girls whereas the percentage of reading in boys is lower than girls.
According to the charts, there is a similarity in the rate of listening to music both boys and girls, with 10%. This is the same with skateboarding in boys and gymnastics in girls, with 11%. Besides, computer game activity is the most popular with boys, with 34 %. This rate is higher than the proportion of choosing computer games in girls, with 16%.
On the other hand, reading is the least popular with boys, with 2%, while the percentage of reading in girls increases significantly, with 21%.
In conclusion, it can be seen from the graph that boys have a trend in physical activities while the girls have trended in mindful activities.
- THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED NUMBER OF VISITORS TO A NEW ART GALLERY FROM ITS OPENING DATE IN 1990 UP TO AND INCLUDING 2001 iT ALSO INDICATES THREE EVENTS IN THE GALLERY S LIFE BELOW THE CHART THERE ARE TWO PIE CHARTS WHICH SHOW THE SATI 70
- The graphs below show the age structure of a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a prediction for 2021. 67
- “Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?” 61
- The percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited different attractions 11
- the table below describe victim by age group offense categories in Venezuela 1999 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65446447335 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4893144827 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143591138819 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681088560026 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562423401005 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966721789543 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687465456948 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.