The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugarsand sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars
and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the price of fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks and how these figures changed throughout the period from 1978 to 2009

Overall, it's clearly that prices of three food groups increased during also similar to the trend of CPI. Although there were some fluctuations, prices of fresh fruits and vegetables still increased appreciably higher than other groups included CPI

All the lines began at the same point around 60 in 1979. The CPI rose steadily over the graph and reached the highest figure about 210 in 2009. The price of sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks also showed the same trend but after 1987 it was lower compared with CPI. Due to some minor fluctuations, the number of sugars and sweets was 200 in the graph trend with 150 of carbonated drinks at the particular time.

Prices rose sharply for fresh fruits and vegetables, especially after 1989. In 2009, it was highest with the figure 330

Votes
No votes yet
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-13 Lâm Kim Yến 73 view
2019-06-19 Phuongkhoa view
Essays by user Phuongkhoa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...he period from 1978 to 2009 Overall, its clearly that prices of three food group...
^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es of three food groups increased during also similar to the trend of CPI. Althou...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94512195122 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3842866904 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6196903275 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223332590117 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107914904345 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642225917817 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157303653059 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078675661991 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.