The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars
and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the changes in price for different food and drinks, compared to the consumer-price index from 1978 to 2009.
Overall, all figures experienced an upward trend over the period given. However, only the figure for fresh fruits and vegetables was higher than that of the consumer price index.
In terms of the consumer price index, the figure started at 60 in 1979 and increased steadily over a 30-year period. It finished at approximately 200 in 2009. Regarding fresh fruits and vegetables, the prices experienced a fluctuation upward trend between 1979 and 2009. It began at 60- the same beginning figure of the consumer price index. After fluctuating, it peaked at 330 in 2008 before decreasing slightly to 320 in 2009.
Sugar and sweets, carbonated drinks had the same trend. Their prices began at 60 in 1979 and increased in the following years. However, they were lower than the price of the consumer price index. At the end of the period, the figures for sugar and sweets, carbonated drinks finished at 200 and 150, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Lâm Kim Yến | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Phuongkhoa | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugarsand sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 73
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 92
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand andGermany in 1980 and 2010. 56
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01694915254 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68475146949 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.634519476 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20035933205 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846891643299 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669882225531 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139679784127 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418710472106 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.