The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegestables, sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features amd make comparisons where relevant
The graph illustrates the price changes of three differents goods in compare with the consumer price index from 1978 to 2009.
Overall, it is evident that the price of fresh fruits and vegestables, sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks increased along with the consumer price index over the period of 31 years. However, only the price of fresh fruits and vegestables was higher than the consumer price index.
During the period, the consumper price index rose steadily from about 60 in 1979 to more than 200 in 2009. The prices of sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks had the same tendency buts the carbonated drinks' price was consistently lower than the sugars and sweets' one, especially since 1989. In 2009, the price of sugars and sweets reached exactly 200 while the price of carbonated drinks just increased to more than 150.
Although there were some minor fluctuations in price of fresh fruits and vegestable, in general, its was usually higher than the consumer price index. Having the same beginning in 1979 at about 60, the price of fruits and vegestables reached peak of more than 300 at the end of the period in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-15 | The cureee | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 67
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified worker such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with better education. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below give information about total oil use if four main consumers from 2009 to 2030 75
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86597938144 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37330693803 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453608247423 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8747469625 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265340267655 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144158123947 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549887269041 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178065455478 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485635833086 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.