The table illustrates the proportion of monthy household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.
The table demonstrates the proportion of money people in five European nations spends on 4 different items every month.
Overall, it is obvious that residents in five countries spend most of their income on food and drinks and housing. Their wages spent on clothing and entertainment were significant lower.
In terms of food and drink, households in Turkey and Spain send the largest amount of their money on this item, at 36% and 31% respectively. Citizens in Frech, UK and Germany spend less income on food and drink,roughly more than 22%. On the other hand, these three nations spend more than 30% of their wages on housing while Turkish and Spanish just use less than 20% of their income for housing.
Clothing is the item that people in all countries spend the least money on. People in France and Spain only spend 7% and 8% on clothing, while residents in UK, Turkey and Germany spend more money on this, at 11%, 12% and 15% respectively. The percentage of household income spend on entertainment of all countries rank from 10% to 19%.
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. 67
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 75
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on family and social life? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , roughly
...many spend less income on food and drink,roughly more than 22%. On the other hand, these...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he other hand, these three nations spend more than 30% of their wages on housing ...
^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in France and Spain only spend 7% and 8% on clothing, while residents in UK, Turk...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79005524862 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57732289933 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7881339572 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345124487042 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152949977836 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911509276277 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216791229894 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437413781806 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.