The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below illustrates changes of the prize for fruits, vegetables, sugar and sweets, carbonated drinks from 1978 to 2009. It is clearly that from 1978 until 1985 the amount of 4 materials have some fluctuations and almost equally same.

The next, fresh fruits and vegetables take the lead because they started from around 52 point and then reached the peak at approximately 325 point in 2007, and slips back slightly to around 310 point in 2009. Consumer-price index shows steady climb from around 52 point to finally reached around 21 point in 2008, after that the graph remain steady until the end of 2009.

Furthermore, Sugar and sweets have slight increment and several fluctuations because the graph always reached high peak and then remain steady and after that reached the bottom peak until it finally reached the highest point in 2009 (approximately 240 ). Carbonated drinks also began at 52 point and rose slightly until finally reached 150 point in 2009.

Overall, fresh fruits and vegetables takes the lead in the graph while, carbonated drinks are the lowest one.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-22 bemoichoianhyeuem view
2023-08-22 bemoichoianhyeuem view
2022-03-29 Blackcytrus 78 view
2022-01-07 yanping 73 view
2021-12-28 madina6369 view
Essays by user npoppp2 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y until the end of 2009. Furthermore, Sugar and sweets have slight increment a...
^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... highest point in 2009 approximately 240 . Carbonated drinks also began at 52 poin...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0782122905 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45735856381 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7640347125 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198494059783 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117304862691 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890305881482 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147927818286 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594948313919 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.