The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided graphic demonstrates the expenditure on various researches which is relevant to renewable resources in four distinct nations, namely Switzerland, Denmark, Spain, and UK, over the course of 25 years, starting in 1975.
A first glance at the line graph reveals that the entire investment in the renewable sources industry of the Swiss transcended that of other counterparts. In addition to this, while Switzerland and Denmark registered an upsurge, the others experienced an inverse pattern throughout the surveyed course.
As is shown in the chart, it is manifest that both individual spending of Switzerland and Denmark ascended to 2 dollars and around 2.3 dollars. In comparison to these figures in the next decade, which observed a noticeable acceleration in the Swiss, that statistic in Denmark was leveling off. However, in the last 10 years, two regions increased with no sign of reduction and reached their peak at 5 dollars and nearly 3.5 dollars respectively.
Now, turning to the other details, it is striking to see that that the remained data fluctuated. Initially, Spanish and British residents indicated an analogous expenditure on renewable source industry with a mere of 1.2 dollars. In 1990, while the spending of Britain rose to around 1 dollar per capita, Spanish only paid for 20 cents; however, at the end of the given period, Spanish expended for more than 50 cents per person, this figure in the UK was approximately 10 cents for each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-24 | dhruv j patel | view | |
| 2021-08-24 | dhruv j patel | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-06 | Cowy | 78 | view |
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitats This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and healthcare To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003 2005 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 59
- The diagrams below give information about changes in a student accommodation 84
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The following graphs depict the reliability of print and non print academic materials as voiced by undergraduates and postgraduates at 3 different British universities Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sources'' or 'source's'?
Suggestion: sources'; source's
... the entire investment in the renewable sources industry of the Swiss transcended that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...he other details, it is striking to see that that the remained data fluctuated. Initially...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20920502092 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90372951637 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623430962343 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0235034482 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932598334666 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373502504884 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396996858193 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596641169728 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347624214922 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.