The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel

Essay topics:

The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart above illustrates the essential factors that 4000 interns acknowledged from their internships.

Standing from an overall point of view, it is clearly seen that Practical Knowledge was what most interns gathered from the periods. However, these internships failed to equip these participant with Teamwork skills as it accounted for the smallest fracture in the total knowledge base.

While other skills took up a 26% according to the results, it was not detailed enough to determine the skills that these intern learned from the duration of the internship. Therefore, taking more detailed knowledge into account, Practical Knowledge was seen as the most common thing that the interns got to experience, with a 15% of the total experience, following by communication skills with 14%. This could be explained by the exposure to the real working environment enabled the intern to acquire these skills for a better adaptation.

Teamwork, a very crucial skill in the business environment, however, did not see such high percentage. With only 3% of the knowledge share, Teamwork was the lowest rank in the whole chart, with Work Environment next on the list with 4%. The distance between official workers and interns could be the explanation for the lack of teamwork and environment understanding of the participants.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-13 ntqkhai 11 view
2022-07-26 olimboy78 57 view
2022-07-26 olimboy78 89 view
2022-07-26 olimboy78 78 view
2019-05-17 Diem Hang 1612 82 view
Essays by user ntqkhai :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart above illustrates the essential factors...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3317535545 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90051265346 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582938388626 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5814479629 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0497848193624 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244350885585 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279493628936 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388103323769 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276669382768 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.