The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the number of Venezuelan students who visited Paris, London, Rome, over a three-year period between 2011 and 2014.
Overall, as can be seen that there is a noticeable change in the number of visiting students among three places during that time. Comparing to London and Paris, Rome witnessed a significant fluctuation in tourists to Rome.
Over three years from 2011 to 2014, there was a steady rise to nearly 20000 visiting students in London. Besides, The number of Venezuelan students visiting Paris hit a peak at exactly 20000 in 2013. After that, it went down steadily to around 17000 in 2014.
Finally, Rome experienced a suddenly decrease in visitors, at about 12000 in 2012 and then rose highly to nearly 18000 in 2013. Then, It dramatically fell down to over 15000 in the number of visiting students.
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of having an older lovers 32
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
Comments
The line graph shows the
The line graph shows the number of students visiting European countries (Paris, London, Rome) between 2011 and 2014.
As illustrated by the graph, the number of students visiting Paris rose significantly, followed with a slight decrease. At the same time, students visiting London experienced an upward trend throughout the period. While the number of students visiting Rome fluctuated from year to year.
The number of students visiting Paris were vastly increased from year 2011 to 2013, reaching a peak of 20000 student visitors in 2013. Despite its huge growth, from 2013 to 2014 it had a slight decrease in the number of student visitors.
Between 2011 and 2014, the number of students visiting London were increased gradually between 2011 and 2014, surpassing the number of Paris’ visitor in the late 2013. It kept increasing and reached its highest level at around 18000 student visitors.
The number of students visiting Rome tended to fluctuate throughout 2011 until 2014. It fell and bottomed out by 2012, but managed to rise to its previous state between 2012 and 2013. From that point, it decreased steadily until 2014.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...own steadily to around 17000 in 2014. Finally, Rome experienced a suddenly dec...
^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('suddenly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...in 2014. Finally, Rome experienced a suddenly decrease in visitors, at about 12000 in 2012 and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01408450704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56601010434 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1385334902 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125007220406 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562809130552 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544876667527 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817338265351 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609454470013 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.