The given line graph illustrates the surveyed report on proportion of Venezuelan students visited to three different locations(Paris, Rome and London) over a period of 4 years from 2011 to 2014.
In the overall trend, it is evident that the number of visitor students increased significantly in London, while Paris and Rome witnessed a sharp decline after few fluctuations over the given period.
Getting back to details, a reverse behaviour can be seen between 2011 and 2012 in Rome and Paris. In 2011, more than 18000 students chose Rome, but this trend plummeted to the lowest value of 12000 in 2012. In contrast, only 10,000 students went to Paris in early year, which rose steadily to nearly 14,000 in 2012. From 2012 to 2013, Rome and Paris followed the similar trend. Rome regained the peak value with 18000 tourists, while number in Paris doubled from the initial value. Finally, after 2013 number of students fell in both the countries and dropped to lower values 16000 and 18000 respectively.
On the other hand, exactly 15000 student tourists visited London in 2011. However, Graph followed a continuous increasing pattern in later years until 2013, after that a surge in number was witnessed with the highest value of 19000 in 2014.
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed 78
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write a 78
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 47
- Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person Do you think this is the best way to do it or are there better alternatives What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the lowest'.
Suggestion: to the lowest
...ts chose Rome, but this trend plummeted to lowest value of 12000 in 2012. In contrast, on...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.038647343 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49426984558 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1557305333 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132376354367 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581259632279 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508696516184 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965428095946 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652496093565 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.