The diagram below shows the water supply in Australia at present and in the future.
The given picture details the step by step procedure of the present system along with the expected improvements going to be implemented in the future water system in Australia.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite the effectiveness of the present system, future changes are going to develop a much better, planned, and an improved treatable system over the coming times.
According to the given illustration, in current times, the water which is stored in dams is supplied in its pure form to different consuming bodies: households, factories, shops, and in the city. After that, the wastewater is directed into the water treatment plant, which further dumps the treated water into the river. In addition, all the stormwater from the consuming bodies is directly linked to the river.
As per the new plan, the main change will be implemented on treating and recycling waste and stormwater. In this context, the waste and the stormwater from houses, shops, factories, and the city will get transferred into the water treatment plant. It is from here that the treated water will be recycled back to the consuming bodies rather than dumping back into the river.
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 47
- The Chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia 78
- A chart on the average annual expenditures on a cell phone and residential phone services 2001 2010 73
- The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in the year 1999 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19387755102 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67294355321 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9409334572 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151468741579 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612342208691 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504390166772 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944834117154 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456777446443 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.