Given are two maps delineating the contrasts between American and Japanese workplaces.
It is perceptible that individuals in the Japanese office are inclined to work in a shared room while the opposite is true for American employees.
When it comes to the layout of a typical Japan office, desks for working purposes are put together and occupy nearly the whole area. Beside that, two section managers can effortlessly observe and interact with all staff in the room due to their convenient working areas along with the engagement of the department manager as the highest position of the office in the furthest north with a massive glass window behind to catch the sunlight for the workplace.
Regarding typical American office, it is clear that all zones are separated so employees can work self-contained. At the middle of the room, L-shaped desks are placed in center alignment with 4 ones each row. Moving to the right of the room, headquarter positions are settled side by side which are 2 section managers and a bigger room for department manager. Furthermore, on the left side of the room, there are two functional rooms for staff - printer area, storage respectively and two rooms for meeting purposes.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations 80
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- In many countries today if people want to find a job they have to move away from their friends and their families Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03980099502 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74037961303 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592039800995 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0471939124 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0685953122998 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039851550739 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409689821491 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636051522234 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363027940142 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.