The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the table contrasting the percentages by three distinct age groups in a Europe country on various TV programmes: Cartoons, Feature films, News, Soap Opera, TV dramas, Sports in 2012.
It is conspicuous that Cartoon’s index of those aged 11-15 is the most gargantuan while the age group of 21-25 is the minutest, sports is the TV program with the highest total percentages of three age groups 11-15, 15-20, 21-25.
When it comes to the rate of Cartoons of groups 11-15, this ranks biggest with 29%, followed by 18% of aged 15-20; and 4% was the lowest number of 21-25. Besides, the percentages of feature films of three age groups 15-20, 21-25, 11-15 accounted at 23%, 20%, 18% respectively. Likewise, data of people who watched sports of age groups 11-15 with 22%, 21% of 21-25, and 15-20 with 18% recorded in 2012.
In regards to the programs with a lower index of viewers, ranked first is TV dramas with 8% of those aged 11-15, followed by 10% of 15-20 and 13% of 21-25. Similarly, Soap Opera with 12% aged 15-20, group aged 11-15 and 21-15 achieved 17%, 19% respectively. Finally, just 6% of News by aged 11-15, 15-20 and 21- 25 aged respectively was recorded with 19% and 23% in the table.
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
..., and 15-20 with 18% recorded in 2012. In regards to the programs with a lower index of view...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, likewise, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67136150235 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47890880612 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3043111838 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107334868381 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749670898692 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464265957775 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103117189065 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051750223394 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 87.39 61.2550243902 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
..., and 15-20 with 18% recorded in 2012. In regards to the programs with a lower index of view...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, likewise, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67136150235 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47890880612 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3043111838 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107334868381 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749670898692 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464265957775 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103117189065 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051750223394 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 87.39 61.2550243902 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.