The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the changes in the amount of acid rain emissions in the UK, from four different categories, namely transport and communication, electricity, gas and water supply, domestic, and other supply, from 1990 to 2007.
Overall, the total amount of acid rain emissions decreased over the 17-year period. While electricity, gas and water supply showed the most decrease, transport and communication remained stable in the amount of emissions.
At the beginning of the period, electricity, gas and water supply was the main source of acid rain emissions in the UK, with about 3.4 million of tones. About 2 million of tones of the emissions came from other industries group. The other two categories, transport and communication and domestic, produced a relative low amount of emissions, at about 0.7 million and 0.6 million of tones, respectively.
Throughout 17 years of period, electricity, gas and water supply contributed a significant cut-down in the amount of emissions to exactly 0.5 millions of tones by the year of 2007. With the same pattern but less pronounced, other industries and domestic sectors showed a gradual decrease in the emissions amount, from 2 million to 1.2 million of tones for the former, and from 0.5 million to 0.1 million of tones for the latter. Transport and communication saw a steady stable pattern from 1990 to 2002, followed by a slight increase to 1 million of tones in 2006 before dropping back to about 0.6 millions of tones as the amount from the beginning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 141, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...in the amount of emissions to exactly 0.5 millions of tones by the year of 2007. With the sam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 597, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...in 2006 before dropping back to about 0.6 millions of tones as the amount from the beginning....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1124497992 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90457248939 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437751004016 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5187529297 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.444444444 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299442687455 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132519841348 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692769144608 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194420060651 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663656110477 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.