The line graph demonstrates the proportion of unemployment in US and Japan during 1993 and 1999. Looking more closely at the trend, it can be clearly seen an opposite form of 2 countries. US has a downward trend whereas Japan has upward trend.
Firstly, US unemployed people were the highest point at 1993, 7 per cent, while it was the lowest point in Japan 2.5 per cent. After that, the figure illustrates a fluctuating decrease during 6-year period from 7 per cent to 5 per cent in 1993 and 1999 respectively. Secondly, Japan unemployment rate had gradually increased to 5 per cent from 1993 and 1999 respectively, there were a consecutive rise every single year. Finally, the graph unveils the intersection between 2 nations in 1998 at 5 per cent.
In conclusion, the evidence shows that United States unemployment situation had been getting better in 6-year period while Japan had an opposite in tendency.
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming richer and the poor are growing poorer. What are the causes of this? what measures can be taken to reduce this problem? 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...downward trend whereas Japan has upward trend. Firstly, US unemployed people were ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96103896104 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87435781912 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2819194328 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175742597803 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904841047836 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675476093442 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113944310864 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320662704494 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.