The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.
It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar, so a strong correlation is suggested.
In 2000, the index of food price was about 90 points. The same pattern can be seen for oil price, just below $30 per barrel. Over following four years, both prices remained relatively stable, before rising dramatically between 2004 and 2007. By 2007, he average of oil price had more than double, to nearly $60 per barrel, food price rose by around 50 points.
In 2008, average global prices of both oil and food rose suddenly, with oil price reaching a peak of approximately $130, world food index reaching to 220 points. By 2009, the figure for both commodities fall significantly, at $40 for average oil prices and 140 points for food price index, before rising one again in 2011. By 2011, oil cost reached at $100 per barrel, while index of food price peaked at 240 points.
The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.
It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar, so a strong correlation is suggested.
In 2000, the index of food price was about 90 points. The same pattern can be seen for oil price, just below $30 per barrel. Over following four years, both prices remained relatively stable, before rising dramatically between 2004 and 2007. By 2007, he average of oil price had more than double, to nearly $60 per barrel, food price rose by around 50 points.
In 2008, average global prices of both oil and food rose suddenly, with oil price reaching a peak of approximately $130, world food index reaching to 220 points. By 2009, the figure for both commodities fall significantly, at $40 for average oil prices and 140 points for food price index, before rising one again in 2011. By 2011, oil cost reached at $100 per barrel, while index of food price peaked at 240 points.
- The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar 78
- The pie charts above give a percentage about water consumption in San Diego County, California and the rest of the world. It is clear from the chart that both San Diego and California consume the most water for residential demand while global population u 73
- The line graph compares the average price of a barrel of oil with the food price index over a period of 11 years.It is clear that average global prices of both oil and food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore, the trends for both commodit 67
- The bar chart shows information about people’s drinking behavior by age group in the US. Severaltrends areevident.The highest proportion of those who never drink (nearly two-thirds) was in the 16 to 24 yearsgroup. The proportion tended to decrease with 56
- The line graph compares three companies about the term of their waste output from 2000 to 2011 It is clear that there were remarkable changes in waste output produced by all three companies as shown in the graph While companies A and B saw a decrease in w 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46276830765 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6007668621 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.67674333044 0.215688989381 314% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.305939278399 0.103423049105 296% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143821354897 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.473258265213 0.15604864568 303% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101561191049 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.