The line chart above compares the difference in the consumption of the four types of boneless meat of four different species per capita.
It is clear that there were significant changes in the choice of meat in the US from 1955 to 2012. In general, beef and pork still remained rather popular over the period, comparing to the poultry, which are turkey and broiler.
In 1955, only pork and beef were available, with 50 pounds and around 58 pounds respectively. It was not until 1961 did broilers and turkey came into use, with about 5 pounds of turkey and 15 pounds of broilers per capita. Over the next 18 years, the amount of pork and turkey remained relatively stable while red meat and broilers experienced quite significant rises to 90 pounds of beef and 30 pounds of broilers per person in 1979.
From 1979 to 2012, there was little to no changes in the volume of pork and turkey consumed per unit of population. Contemporarily, broilers supply showed a tendency of rise rather steadily to roughly 55 pounds proportionately in 2012. By contrast, the 43-year time saw a sudden then steady drop in the demand to consume beef, to just 50 pounds per person in 2012.
The line chart above compares the difference in the consumption of the four types of boneless meat of four different species per capita.
It is clear that there were significant changes in the choice of meat in the US from 1955 to 2012. In general, beef and pork still remained rather popular over the period, comparing to the poultry, which are turkey and broiler.
In 1955, only pork and beef were available, with 50 pounds and around 58 pounds respectively. It was not until 1961 did broilers and turkey came into use, with about 5 pounds of turkey and 15 pounds of broilers per capita. Over the next 18 years, the amount of pork and turkey remained relatively stable while red meat and broilers experienced quite significant rises to 90 pounds of beef and 30 pounds of broilers per person in 1979.
From 1979 to 2012, there was little to no changes in the volume of pork and turkey consumed per unit of population. Contemporarily, broilers supply showed a tendency of rise rather steadily to roughly 55 pounds proportionately in 2012. By contrast, the 43-year time saw a sudden then steady drop in the demand to consume beef, to just 50 pounds per person in 2012.
- The line chart above compares waste products in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that company A and B tended to produce less waste than they used to by the beginning. On the other hand, company C’s rate 67
- The line chart above demonstrates the average number of people travelling long distances to work by car of public transports, bus and train in particular, in the UK from 1970 to 2030.It is clear that there were and will be significant changes in the numbe 73
- The pie charts compare the proportions of people falling into three distinct age groups in Yemen and Italy in two different years. It is clear that Italy had the older population in the year 2000, and that the same is predicted for the year 2050. The popu 73
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work by the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who went and will go to 73
- The line chart above compares the amount of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden and America.It is clear from the chart that three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But o 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above compares the difference in the co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70388349515 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5755846977 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1907892662 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365980635848 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179207142045 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218257686992 0.0843802449381 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30075595233 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238261088666 0.0819641961636 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.