The given bar chart displays the coffee production in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, and in Vietnam over a period of 30 years, starting from 1990.
Overall, all four countries experienced an upward trend, except for Colombia. Notably, Brazil emerged as the leading country in terms of coffee production throughout the provided period.
Upon analyzing the data for greater detail, it can be observed that Brazil produced the highest amount of coffee with about 0.7 million tonnes, compared with 0.6 million tonnes in Colombia. During the next 20 years, the amount of coffee made in Brazil peaked at almost 1.9 million tonnes, while Colombia recorded a dramatic drop to around 0.3 million tonnes, which is a double decrease from the 1990 figure.
Regarding the remaining countries, Indonesia and Vietnam registered the lowest coffee production figures, with 0.2 and 0.1 million tonnes respectively. Over the following 5 years, coffee production in Indonesia remained relatively unchanged, before reaching second place with 0.4 million tonnes in 2010. Meanwhile, Vietnam also witnessed an enormous growth in its coffee manufacture with roughly 0.3 million tonnes in the final year, despite no change during the first 5 years.
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 89
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from 5 organizations Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, second, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45263157895 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58332603579 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3181255625 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200528407481 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977891536859 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477998278988 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131148775688 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297621520212 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.