The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
The bar graph compares the coffee yield in 4 separate nations over a period of 20 years, starting from 1990.
Overall, except for Colombia, it is evident that most countries experienced a steady increase in coffee production. Additionally, throughout the period shown, Brazil succeeded in maintaining its position as the top nation for the amount of coffee produced.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 1990, a minor difference of around 0.1 million tonnes was seen in the production of coffee in Brazil and Columbia. Moreover, producing 0.2 million tonnes, Indonesia’s coffee yield was twice as much as that of Vietnam. Five years later, coffee producers in Brazil boosted their production to 1 million tonnes while an insignificant decrease was seen in the production of coffee in Columbia. Meanwhile, both Indonesia and Vietnam underwent no variation in the amount of coffee they made.
In the remaining years of the period, Brazil’s coffee yield witnessed noticeable growth, causing it to reach its peak of 1.9 million tonnes in 2010. By contrast, standing at 0.3 million tonnes, Columbia coffee producers lost half of their production at the end of the given period.
In addition, a minor but stable increase in coffee production in Indonesia and Vietnam was recorded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | linhchang | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-25 | lalo | view |
- Some people feel that government should regulate the level of violence in films on television and at the cinemas Others feel that violent films should not be regulated Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25603864734 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83558007547 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8493460679 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2468977303 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101174225737 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509007155298 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134640186027 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416431411562 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.