: The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010.
The bar chart compares the amount of coffee manufactured in four different nations (Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, and Vietnam) between 1990 and 2010.
It is clear that Brazil produced by far the highest amount of coffee during the research period. Additionally, while the amount of coffee made in Colombia decreased gradually, the three remaining nations saw upward trends.
In 1990, there were around 0,7 million tonnes of coffee produced in Brazil, followed by Colombia at exactly 0,6 million. By contrast, the figures for Indonesia and Vietnam were much lower, at approximately 0,2 million tonnes and 0,1 million tonnes respectively.
Ten years later, Brazil witnessed a dramatic increase of roughly 1 million to 1,8 million tonnes in the amount of coffee production. However, in Colombia, only 0,5 million tonnes were the amount of coffee produced in 1995, and the figure dropped gradually to 0,3 million in 2010. Meanwhile, Indonesia and Vietnam experienced slight increases in the amount of coffee production to 0,4 million and 0,3 million respectively, despite stability in the figure for Indonesia between 1990 and 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | linhchang | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- Task 2 Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 84
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 78
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertiliser compost Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re for Indonesia between 1990 and 1995.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44886363636 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75257556888 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8096474339 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129813877264 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727477309207 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505777710059 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976548491724 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520596844544 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.