The bar chart indicates details about producing coffee in Brazil, Columbia, Indonesia, and Vietnam during the period between 1990 and 2010.
It is obvious from the chart that Brazil produced the most coffee among 4 countries while Vietnam tended to produce the least amount. On the contrary, Columbia was the only country whose coffee production declined over the period.
In 1990, the amount of coffee produced in Brazil was approximately 0.7 million tones, which was moderately higher than that of Columbia with 0.6 million tones, three times greater than that of Indonesia, at 0.2 million and 0,6 million tonnes higher than the figure for Vietnam.
Throughout the whole time frame, Columbia saw a steady decrease in coffee production over this period, which gradually fell to 0.3 million tons by 2010. In contrast, Brazil continued to increase substantially, jumping to 1,9 million tonnes, a rise of more than 1 million tonnes.Coffee productions in Indonesia and Vietnam also experienced a gradual growth to 0.4 and 0.3 million tonnes, being equal to that of Columbia, respectively.
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced 11
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below gives information about the amount of time children spend with their parents 73
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy for most countries However alternative sources of energy have been encouraged to be used by some countries To what extent is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Coffee
...s, a rise of more than 1 million tonnes.Coffee productions in Indonesia and Vietnam al...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32947976879 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70441172184 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0387627138 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181858822294 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112857830283 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507155369863 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129326610362 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614301350239 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.