The picture below show the differences in the layout of conference centre between its present and its future plan Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The maps demonstrate a number of changes which take place in the conference centre from 2010 to 2025.

Overall, the conference centre witnesses radical changes with the most noticeable being the addition of facilities to accommodate public's need.

A glance at the first picture reveals that in 2010, there was two rooms and a hall in the north west surrounding the reception. Moreover, a car park was on the right hand side of the hall, followed by a garden in the east of the map, besides, the rest of the conference centre was the garden on the bottom left hand corner.

Turning to other set of the second plan, the rooms, the hall and the reception at the top left corner will remain unchanged after 15 years. Furthermore, a large car park on the right-hand side is expected to replace the old garden. In the North East of the map, it is anticipated that residence hall for 20 rooms will be constructed. On top of that, there is a prediction that there will be more facilities induding IT Contra, Canteen and Kitchen, Meeting Room built in the south west and Jame Room and Music Roam erected on the opposite side next to the car park.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, moreover, second, so, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59512195122 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51529526925 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546341463415 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7450475462 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0760793618315 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354090550396 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242993256878 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554169829082 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019105474103 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.