The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990.
The fast-food consumption in the UK between 1970 and 1990 is presented in the line graph.
Overall, the consumption of fish & chips and hamburger rose dramatically while the pizza consumption showed the reverse. Also, more people in the UK preferred to consume fish & chips compared to other fast food.
The figures for fish and chips consumption rose steadily from virtually 100 to about 150 grams, between 1970 and 1980, a rise of around 50, in a 10-year period. Again, the consumption of hamburger increased slightly by more or less 70. By contrast, a steady decline was seen in the amount of pizza consumed to just above 200. By 1990, both figures for fish & chips and hamburger continued to incline dramatically.
The former chart had shown a shown threefold increase (had tripled) and reacted by far the most popular fast food consumed by British (consumption in the UK) while the latter one the had increased to almost the pizza’s figure at the beginning of the year. After a long period of steady decline, the one for pizza had rebounced back to just above 200.
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring programme. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1989. 78
- Due to human activities on land and in the sea, the animals are becoming extinct.What are the reasons and solutions? 56
- Advertising is commonly found what are the advantages and disadvantages of advertising? 78
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 82
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89617486339 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66560419347 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5180907793 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229026491153 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106372393907 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122154021142 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189566709973 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139016640527 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.