The graph illustrates the quantity of chicken, beef, lamb, and fish consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given bar chart depicts the usage of fish and three types of meat in a European country within 25 years.
At a glance, it is obvious that chicken is the only type which has not had downfall between 1979 and 2004. In 1979, the fish started about 60g/week and had a slight drop till 1984 and then ended below 50g per week. Furthermore, the lamb and chicken started in 1979 around the 150g range. While the lamb had a downward trend till the year 1999, the chicken had an overall upward trend until 1999 and then showed a sharp rose till ended in 2004. Finally, beef was the highest consumed meat in 1979 however, it had significant drop until 1984 and then showed an overall downward trend till the end which resulted the chicken became the highest consumed meat in 2004.
overall, it is clear that people in the european country move away from the beef and lamb but increase the use of chicken. Further, the fish is not much affected by time.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 84
- The graph illustrates the quantity of chicken, beef, lamb, and fish consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...he highest consumed meat in 2004. overall, it is clear that people in the europea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51724137931 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03493728282 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8620507142 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325265390416 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14016385953 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598965930786 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201263125567 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533462162044 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.