The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.
The given pie charts show the outcome of a survey which asked guests how they rated the hotel's customer service in the year 2005 and 2010.
At a glance, it is obvious that almost half of the guests in 2005 had rated satisfactory, however, in 2010, the highest percentage was owned by the good figure (39%). The Excellent figure had shown dramatic increase from 2005 (5%) to 2010 (28%). Moreover, in 2005 there were 15% of very poor ratings which had shown significant drop in 2010(4%). One of five visitors rated poor in 2005 but after five years it had reduced to 12%. there is a clear pattern visible in these two charts, from 20005 to 2010 all negative ratings had been reduced and all other positive ratings(Excellent and good) took over those places.
To summarize, it is clear that within five years hotel's customer service had been improved towards guests which enable them to add positive ratings.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 84
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The graph illustrates the quantity of chicken, beef, lamb, and fish consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hotels'' or 'hotel's'?
Suggestion: hotels'; hotel's
...y which asked guests how they rated the hotels customer service in the year 2005 and 2...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure 39%. The Excellent figure had shown dramatic increase from 2005 5% to 2010 2...
^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...15% of very poor ratings which had shown significant drop in 20104%. One of five ...
^^
Line 4, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...after five years it had reduced to 12%. there is a clear pattern visible in these two...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75949367089 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35133183886 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8182578545 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273015085518 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137875788329 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132569715902 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236973106035 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153148239261 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.