The graph show the annual income of language-related jobs in US dollars in five cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates the yearly earning in US dollar from linguistic related occupation in 5 metropolitan areas including Mexico, Dubai, Paris, Munich and Toronto.
Overall, the figure of language teacher and interpreter is highest in Toronto among 5 cities, while both Paris and Munich have the same date for the annual income as a translator. In contrast, the annual earning from 3 jobs in Mexico remained the lowest in all sectors.
Regarding to interpreter, the annual income in Toronto was 80000 USD, compared to around to 3 other cities including Munich, Paris and Dubai with 5000 USD lower. The figure for Mexico was much lower at about 18000 USD. Similarly, language teacher in Toronto earned around 65000 USD, followed by Dubai and Munich (60000 USD). The data for remaining cities were 35000 USD for Paris and 19000 USD for Mexico.
The translator in both Munich and Paris got the same income yearly at approximately 65000 USD, while the annual income of translator who came from Toronto was a bit lower than that of Munich and Paris by roughly 1000 USD. The two following areas had much lower figure for translator which was for Dubai (50000 USD) and for Mexico (18500 USD).
- All children should be made to wear school uniform To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- Many developing countries require aid from Intercontinental organisation to develop.Many people think that this aid should be financial while others think that particular and advices are more useful. 84
- Some people believe the aims of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe are much wider benefit of university education for both individuals and society. 56
- Some people believe the aims of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe are much wider benefit of university education for both individuals and society. 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come of translator who came from Toronto was a bit lower than that of Munich and ...
^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f Munich and Paris by roughly 1000 USD. The two following areas had much lower figu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91584158416 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43004770526 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5603446052 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0876153823996 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470556638755 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320890127446 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702049224753 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273046032917 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come of translator who came from Toronto was a bit lower than that of Munich and ...
^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f Munich and Paris by roughly 1000 USD. The two following areas had much lower figu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91584158416 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43004770526 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5603446052 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0876153823996 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470556638755 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320890127446 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702049224753 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273046032917 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.