The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in
2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts depicted the primary ways of vehicles that have been used to transfer between different universities in 2004 and five years later in 2009. At first glance, it was clear that there is a fairly even distribution of various types of transport for people traveling to one university in 2004, especially by car. However, half a decade later, there was a significant change in the methods of traveling which relied much on buses instead of cars. In 2004, it is evident that cars made up over a half of the total transport at 51%. In close was bus at over a quarter of total 33%. The remaining 16% were illustrated by three sectors, bicycle, train and walking. Nevertheless, in the year 2009, using buses increased dramatically to nearly half of the total at 46%. Similarly, bicycles became more popular with a sharp rise by 7% to 16%. and two other sectors, train and walking, slowly rose by 1% or 2%. Conversely, cars drastically dropped to just over a quarter of the total at 28%. In summary, it can be seen that people rather use different transports which are environmentally friendly such as bus and bicycle than private vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 78
- Describe a time you were sleepy but had to stay awake You should say When it was Why you had to stay awake How you kept yourself awake And explain how you felt about it 56
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 61
- The use of social media is replaced face to face interaction among people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph show the annual income of language related jobs in US dollars in five cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owever, half a decade later, there was a significant change in the methods of tra...
^^
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much on buses instead of cars. In 2004, it is evident that cars made up over a h...
^^
Line 1, column 851, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...popular with a sharp rise by 7% to 16%. and two other sectors, train and walking, s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71641791045 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73437289499 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4813482483 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1818181818 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138758964549 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456864473837 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052308638875 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138758964549 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.