The given line graph illustrates the alterations and differences in the percentage of 65 aged and over population in USA, Sweden and Japan during the period 1940 to 2040.
Overall the proportion shows that there was an upward trend in the 2040 in all countries in the graph.
The percentage of population aged above 65 aged stood at 9% in 1940 and constantly increased by 6% to 15% in 1980. However, 65-aged and over population in USA was experienced a slight declined to 14% in 2020. In the end of graph, this proportion will be predicted soar by 11% to 23% in 2040.
In the first year in Sweden, the investigated percent stood at 7% and in subsequent years this proportion constantly fluctuate. Eventually, this percentage will be predicted climb to 25%.
In Japan, this percentage is approximate 5% in 1940. In contrast to two countries above, Japanese aged 65 and over was documented that significantly decreased to 3% in 1960 and maintained the same level until 1990s. After the reduction, the over aged population in this country underwent the dramatic rise to 27% at the end of the investigation.
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- The graph below shows the sales of children's books, adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country. 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. What do you think are the causes of this? what solutions can you suggest? 67
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 73
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96255486058 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4993333274 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242324678336 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100660686142 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654619057141 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147737292412 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780625149612 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.