The graph shows the amount of money earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002
The line graph shows how much income was gained per week in 2002 by graduates of different age groups with a degree, a higher degree and other qualifications.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was considerable upward trends for both first degree and higher degree, whereas the earnings of others went down significantly. An other interesting point is that the wage of 21 to 25 for three levels was the lowest salary and the highest belonged to graduates with other qualifications at about the age 36 to 40.
Looking at the details, others had the highest wage and higher degree had the second highest wage at the age 21 to 25, which was approximately 400. On the contrary, the youngest age of first degree was the lowest, having remained at around 350. After that, there was a signifiacnt soar in 31 to 35 of three levels. Futhermore, 35 to 40 of other qualifications stayed steadily the most outstanding point throughout nearly 820.
On the other hand, despite others saw a decline sizably from more than 800 to 710 in the age of 50, the figure then recovered to nearly 800 in the age 60. The earings of higher and first degree flutuated in the 40 to 46. Fromm 50 to the end, the salary of others went down to less than 700, however, there was a slight rise in the wage of the first degree.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | uienteo26 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | Tham_Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | lmlowi.2004 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | akorn99 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | cheesequang | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: Another
...ings of others went down significantly. An other interesting point is that the wage of 2...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, then, whereas, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51464435146 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57739227296 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514644351464 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9902427414 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151950519736 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616551409405 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943045156758 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126918787483 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12000451138 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.