The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002. It includes those with a degree, those with a higher degree (postgraduates) and those with other qualifications.
The graph illustrates how different demographic groups would earn their salary weekly based on three types of qualification, which are first degree, higher degree and others, in the year 2002.
Overall, people with others qualification made the most amount of money all age, while first degree owners had the lowest earnings each week, in general. It is noticeable that employees with higher degree could receive higher salary than the two others when reached an old age.
As the one with highest income in total, the others qualification group earned just above 400 pound at age 21-25. This figure increased dramatically and hit its peak at the age 36-40, where the salary of this group higher than the other almost a hundred pound. However, from the age 40 to 60, the number experienced a gradual dip and stopped at just below 700 pound. Staff with first degree qualification also followed the same pattern, beginning with about 200 pound, the income experienced an upward trend and reached its highest point at the age 36-40 with approximately 700 pound. After that this figure gradually decreased and ended up at the same point with the others qualification group.
Regarding the employees with higher degree qualification, the pattern was repeated, the number started low with about 400 pound then it underwent steady raise, which reached around 750 pound at age 41-45. Surprisingly, the figure soared up to just below 800 pound, a hundred pound higher than the other two group at the same age, in comparison, after experienced a slight drop.
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give opinion 73
- The flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children 78
- Some people believe that it would be beneficial if employees worked three or four days per week rather than five or six days Why is this Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment poverty and animal welfare than previous generations What is your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
... when reached an old age. As the one with highest income in total, the others qualificati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...e one with highest income in total, the others qualification group earned just above 4...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...alification group earned just above 400 pound at age 21-25. This figure increased dra...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...adual dip and stopped at just below 700 pound. Staff with first degree qualification ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... same pattern, beginning with about 200 pound, the income experienced an upward trend...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...at the age 36-40 with approximately 700 pound. After that this figure gradually decre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...and ended up at the same point with the others qualification group. Regarding the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
..., the number started low with about 400 pound then it underwent steady raise, which r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... steady raise, which reached around 750 pound at age 41-45. Surprisingly, the figure ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... the figure soared up to just below 800 pound, a hundred pound higher than the other ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...hundred pound higher than the other two group at the same age, in comparison, after e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08984375 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58351413545 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0877218574 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.3 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32433050011 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153674112712 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686355945758 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217459263898 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583586501322 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.