The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The line graph compares the expenditure on books of people in four different nations from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that people in Germany spent more on books than those in other three countries. However, spending on books increased in all four countries over the period of 10 years.
In 1995. $80 million spent on books in Germany. This figure then continued increasing over the period, and reached its highest point, at almost $100 million in 2005. The amount of money spent on books in France in 1995 stood at $55 million. The figure for Italy and Austria in the same year were lower, at exactly $50 million and $30 million respectively.
Over the period between 1995 and 2005, the expenditure on books in France witness a steady increase, this figure finally reached the peak of $75 million in 2005. Despite fluctuations, spending on books in both nations Italy and Austria rose gradually to $60 million in 2003. Throughout the remainder of the period, the figure for Austria had gone up to over $70 million by the year 2005, compared to just over $60 million in Italy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... for Italy and Austria in the same year were lower, at exactly 0 million and 0 milli...
^^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpared to just over 0 million in Italy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69841269841 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49054087996 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502645502646 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5574963534 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306957682401 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146971771808 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894232653889 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181847251059 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057192770112 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.