The graph shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008

Essay topics:

The graph shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.

The line graph illustrates the income gap between two genders in five different nations between 1978 to 2008.

Overall, it is clear that there was a reduction in the percentage difference in incomes of men and women for most of the period. However, after 1998, the percentage gap in gender incomes suddenly rose in australia.

In 1978, there was a difference of almost 50% in incomes between men and women in japan, compared to 33% in the us. Both countries then saw a steady reduction over the period between 1978 and 2008, so that the figures for japan and the us by the year 2008 were over 40% and 28% respectively.

there was also a reduction in the income gap between men and women in the uk and france. The percentage difference in income between genders in those countries were lower than japan or the us. over the period of 30 years, these figures declined gradually from about 30% to over 25% in the uk and from 20% to 17% in france in 2008. In australia, the difference in gender incomes was consistently lower than those of the other three countries, at 18% until 1998. after this time, it began to rise throughout the remainder of the period, and reached the peak of 25% in the year 2008, overtaking the figure for france.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-14 bigdaddy2804 view
2023-04-14 bigdaddy2804 view
2021-08-15 phg_phg 84 view
2020-05-08 Munn Nguyen 84 view
2020-02-15 khoibeo3g 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... were over 40% and 28% respectively. there was also a reduction in the income gap ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...her three countries, at 18% until 1998. after this time, it began to rise throughout ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57847533632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47825914396 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479820627803 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8022387125 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445841597464 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190000758719 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108212213295 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298920105248 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407731150283 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.