The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the spending on books by people living in four countries from 1995 to 2005.
It is obvious that expenditure on books increased in each country during the 10-year period, with the biggest rise taking place in Austria. However, Germans spent by far the most on books in each year.
In 1995, $80 million was spent on books by residents of Germany. The figures for France and Italy were lower, at just under $60 million each, which was nearly double the amount of money used for books by people in Austria. However, this country saw a sharp increase in the expenses on books of approximately $32 million over only four years between 2001 and 2005, overtaking Italy in 2003 and peaking at just over $70 million in 2005. This was only slightly lower than the equivalent figure for France where the costs on books rose steadily by about $20 million over the whole 10 years.
Nevertheless, expenditure on books in German, in spite of some minor fluctuations, continued to be higher than that in other three countries over the following ten years and had increased to just under $100 million by 2005. Similarly, although Italy witnessed figures fluctuate slightly between 1995 and 1999, but it then climbed slowing to just over $60 million in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
- In many country, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think university graduates who become new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few decades. What is your view? 78
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012. 56
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7752293578 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46249965553 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0557591619 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188773016655 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960200428386 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448531896346 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113325202016 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337199167711 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.