The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the spending on books by people living in four countries from 1995 to 2005.
It is obvious that expenditure on books increased in each country during the 10-year period, with the biggest rise taking place in Austria. However, Germans spent by far the most on books in each year.
In 1995, Germans spent $80 million on books. The figures for France and Italy were lower, at just under $60 million each, which was nearly double the amount of money used for books by people living in Austria.
However, after climbing slowly of $10 million in the initial six years, Austria's expenses on books soared to just over $70 million in 2005. Nevertheless, spending on books by Germans remained the highest throughout the following 10-year period, reaching $100 million in 2005.
Both France and Italy saw expenditure on books grew to approximately $55 million in 1997. Subsequently, the rise in France continued and peaking at around $75 million in 2005, but the figure for Italy dropped slightly in 1999 and then increased steadily to just over $60 million at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.https://www.ielts-exam.net/images/graphs/IELTS_Writing_Task_1_15 67
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- In many country, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think university graduates who become new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few decades. What is your view? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86631016043 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50579128471 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1008033426 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159689317879 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794627949124 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241863104819 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983449624008 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281534680985 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.