The provided graph outlines the yearly income of three bakeries located in London, namely Bernie’s Buns, Lovely Loaves and Robbie’s Bakery, over a 10-year period starting from 2000. It cannot be ignored that both Robbie's Bakery and Bernie's Buns demonstrate an upwards trend in earned income. At the same time Lovely Loaves indicates a gradual reduction year by year.
What has to be underlined is the sudden rise in numbers in both the cases of Robbie's Bakery and Bernie's Buns. After having remained remarkably stable until 2005, the yearly income of the former takes off extraordinarily to reach the high of 100.000 pounds by 2010 giving the sharpest rise of 33% in 2007. Similarly, Bernie's Buns leads a consistent increment especially in the course of the years 2007-2010 resulting in tripling its income by 2010. This increase takes place in two basic steps, firstly in 2002 with a rise of 20.000 pounds and secondly in 2007 with another equal one.
On the other hand Lovely Loaves not only fails to record growth but even more witnesses its figures plunge through the same period. Departing from the high of almost 90.000 pound in 2001 it fluctuates between that and 95.000 pounds until 2004. Following, however, it drops to 60.000 pounds from 2005 to 2007 and then even more to 40.000 pounds from 2008 to 2010.
In conclusion, in what seems to be a relatively stable financial environment, Robbie's Bakery takes the lead in profitability followed by Bernie's Buns while Lovely Loaves drops to the third place recording a sharp decrease in income.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, thus, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06557377049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67030763487 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58606557377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.979363051 43.030603864 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 206.0 112.824112599 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.6666666667 22.9334400587 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899407419802 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494222343771 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327371932023 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663820464887 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267017556818 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.