The provided graph outlines the yearly income of three bakeries located in London, namely Bernie’s Buns, Lovely Loaves and Robbie’s Bakery, over a 10-year period starting from 2000. It cannot be ignored that both Robbie's Bakery and Bernie's Buns demonstrate an upwards trend in earned income. At the same time Lovely Loaves indicates a gradual reduction year by year.
What has to be underlined is the sudden rise in numbers in both the cases of Robbie's Bakery and Bernie's Buns. After having remained remarkably stable until 2005, the yearly income of the former takes off extraordinarily to reach the high of 100.000 pounds by 2010 giving the sharpest rise of 33% in 2007. Similarly, Bernie's Buns leads a consistent increment especially in the course of the years 2007-2010 resulting in tripling its income by 2010. This increase takes place in two basic steps, firstly in 2002 with a rise of 20.000 pounds and secondly in 2007 with another equal one.
On the other hand Lovely Loaves not only fails to record growth but even more witnesses its figures plunge through the same period. Departing from the high of almost 90.000 pound in 2001 it fluctuates between that and 95.000 pounds until 2004. Following, however, it drops to 60.000 pounds from 2005 to 2007 and then even more to 40.000 pounds from 2008 to 2010.
In conclusion, in what seems to be a relatively stable financial environment, Robbie's Bakery takes the lead in profitability followed by Bernie's Buns while Lovely Loaves drops to the third place recording a sharp decrease in income.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, similarly, then, third, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01149425287 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53306838842 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593869731801 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4059038588 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0748437794654 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303600657873 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338287566058 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.045155604404 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343046473149 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.